Attorneys who handle residential construction defect litigation, insurance disputes, and DTPA cases see this pattern repeatedly. A storm, fire, or plumbing loss occurs. The carrier dispatches-or the homeowner independently hires-a national “disaster cleanup” brand. The marketing pitch is remediation, mitigation, and speed. What actually follows is something far more troubling: wholesale remodeling work performed by entities that were never hired, never qualified, and never le

In residential construction trade litigation, attorneys routinely turn to licensed tradespeople—plumbers, electricians, HVAC technicians, roofers, and similar contractors—with the expectation that technical competence in the field translates into competence as an expert. In practice, this assumption frequently proves false. This article addresses a recurring and underappreciated problem in construction litigation: most tradespeople are capable of inspecting and repairing work

In Texas residential construction, few issues generate more downstream defects, disputes, and litigation exposure than change orders. What is often treated by builders as a routine contractual adjustment frequently becomes the root cause of undisclosed code violations, uninspected work, voided manufacturer warranties, and ultimately, homeowner losses that surface months or years after closing. From a code-compliance and expert-witness perspective, change orders are not admini

In Texas residential construction litigation, defense counsel frequently leans on a familiar refrain: the house passed inspection  or there are no code violations . That argument is rhetorically convenient—but legally incomplete and, in many cases, materially misleading. Experienced construction litigators understand that building codes establish only a minimum legal threshold, not the full measure of a contractor’s duty. In defect litigation, the operative question is not wh

Attorneys handling residential construction defect cases routinely assume that once defects are properly identified, documented, and opined upon by a qualified expert, the next step-repair-is largely administrative. In theory, competent contractors should be readily available to scope, price, and perform corrective work consistent with code, manufacturer requirements, and accepted construction science. In practice, that assumption is increasingly wrong. Across Texas, and part

In Texas residential construction disputes, energy-code violations are routinely minimized by builders as “performance issues,” “comfort complaints,” or matters resolved by a passed municipal inspection. That framing is legally and technically incorrect.   Residential energy codes adopted by Texas jurisdictions are mandatory building codes, not aspirational efficiency guidelines. When those provisions are violated, the result is not merely higher utility bills, but concealed

In residential injury litigation, defense counsel frequently relies on two familiar refrains: the incident was an “accident,” and the house “passed inspection.” Neither argument withstands scrutiny once the purpose and structure of the International Residential Code (IRC)  and the National Electrical Code (NEC)  are properly understood.   Those codes are not aspirational guidelines. They are adopted into law because decades of injury and fatality data demonstrate that specifi

In Texas residential construction-defect matters, the end-of-warranty (EOW) inspection  is often the last opportunity to document code violations and construction defects while contractual leverage still exists. Once the express warranty expires, builders predictably narrow their obligations, dispute causation, and challenge notice sufficiency. From a litigation and pre-litigation standpoint, a properly executed EOW inspection functions as evidence preservation , not consumer

Over the past year, I have been contacted by multiple Texas property owners whose municipalities are demanding that they hire—and pay for—a so-called “third-party inspector” to retroactively evaluate construction completed decades ago, as though it were new construction subject to current building codes. These demands are often framed as prerequisites to permit closure, continued occupancy, or recognition of an existing use that has been in place for many years.   This practi

Across the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex, a growing number of builders have begun dictating the exact date and time when a buyer’s independent final inspection “may” occur, often limiting the window to a single option with no exceptions. These notices read less like coordination and more like commands: one day, one time, take it or leave it. It is an unmistakable attempt to limit oversight of defective work by making third-party inspections as inconvenient and impossible as pos

Across the Dallas–Fort Worth region, a growing number of builders now condition their sales contracts on one astonishing limitation: the buyer may conduct only a single inspection , almost always the final inspection immediately before closing. On paper, this appears benign—a scheduling control measure. In practice, it’s a calculated device that shields builders from scrutiny, prevents early defect discovery, and leaves buyers functionally defenseless against construction fai

When a home construction project goes wrong, the same builder or contractor who caused the problem often demands the right to return to the property for “repairs,” “testing,” or “inspection.” To the uninitiated, that might sound cooperative. To anyone familiar with post-construction disputes, it is an enormous liability trap. Once a disagreement exists, the property is no longer just a house — it is a piece of evidence. Any careless act, untrained worker, or uninsured “expert

When litigating a residential construction dispute, building codes are often the fulcrum of liability. In Texas, the International...

Attorneys handling residential construction cases in Texas often assume that when a builder produces an “inspection report” from an...

Few building failures generate more litigation in Texas than water intrusion through windows and doors. Builders often try to frame these...

In North Texas, the house-flipping industry has become a booming business. Investors—many with little to no construction...

"Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation: A Legal Minefield for Texas Homeowners" Spray polyurethane foam (SPF) insulation is aggressively marketed by Texas builders as a premium “green” upgrade. Brochures promise high R-values per inch, reduced utility bills, and airtight building envelopes that easily meet International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) requirements. In practice, however, SPF is one of the most litigation-prone materials currently used in Texas residential c

One of the least discussed, but most impactful, realities in residential construction litigation is the deliberate insulation of major...

One of the most frequently overlooked defects in residential construction is voltage drop. Most municipal inspectors and even private...

Window replacement in existing homes is one of the most litigated areas of residential construction. It involves not only workmanship but...